Undoubtedly, the discussion on axioms and their epistemic value and validity is one of the most important topics in Islamic epistemology. The debate on the validity, criteria, and reason for the truth of axioms is dependent on various foundations, one of which is the "origin of the truth of axioms." This paper examines three main topics related to the origin of the truth of axioms. First, various views of Muslim logicians regarding its origin and the way to arrive at it are presented and critiqued. Then, based on the preferred view, the unquestionability of axioms is explained through three interpretations. Following this, based on the chosen perspective, this paper examines the mode of inclusion of essential components and logical implications within the subject of axioms. It is demonstrated that based on the principles of Muslim logicians and the causal relationship between the subject and predicate of axioms and demonstrative propositions, it is possible to address the objection of "lack of connection of logical implications with the subject" and overcome the relativism arising from it - an issue that some Western philosophers, like Kant, have propagated.