1
Ph.D. Graduate in Transcendent Philosophy, Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute.
2
Assistant Professor and Faculty Member of Imam Khomeini Education and Research Institute.
Abstract
One of the fundamental issues in the philosophy of technology is determining the ontological status of technological artifacts and clarifying the precise distinction between them and natural entities. Some thinkers, by ascribing ontological primacy to technological artifacts, have proposed a specific ontology of these artifacts that necessitates particular ontological and legal implications. These perspectives and their consequences are not acceptable according to the principles of Islamic philosophy. Accordingly, employing an analytical-philosophical method with a critical approach, this study first elucidates several ontological perspectives on technology from the standpoint of Western philosophy and then critically examines them on the basis of Islamic philosophy. According to the findings of this research, unlike natural entities, which possess unity and real existence, technological artifacts are conventional composites whose effects are no more than the resultant effects of their parts. Based on this theoretical foundation, the following views are found to be incorrect: "technological essentialism," "technology as function," "intentionalism," "multiple functions," "the dual nature of artifacts," "the use-plan," "social artifact," and "causal power".
مصباح یزدی، محمدتقی(1390). جامعه و تاریخ از نگاه قرآن. قم: انتشارات مؤسسه آموزشى و پژوهشى امام خمینى:.
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــ (1394). آموزش فلسفه (ج1). چاپ چهارم. قم: انتشارات مؤسسه آموزشى و پژوهشى امام خمینى:.
مطهری، مرتضی (1378). مجموعه آثار، (ج15،9،7،5). چاپ هشتم. تهران: انتشارات صدرا.
هایدگر، مارتین (1377). «پرسش از تکنولوژی»، در: فلسفه تکنولوژی، ترجمه شاپور اعتماد. تهران: نشر مرکز.
Achterhuis, H. J., et al (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Indiana University Press.
Baker, L. R. (2004). The ontology of artifacts. Philosophical explorations, 7(2), 99-111.
Borgo, S., & Vieu, L. (2009). Artefacts in formal ontology. In Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (pp. 273-307). North-Holland.
Elder, C. L. (1995). A different kind of natural kind. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 73(4), 516-531.
Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (1954). The question concerning technology. Technology and values: Essential readings, 99, 113.
Houkes, W., & Meijers, A. (2006) The ontology of artifacts: the hard problem, Studies in history and philosophy of science part A, 37 (1) 118–131.
Houkes, W., & Vermaas, P. (2009). Artefacts in analytic metaphysics: Introduction. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 13(2), 74-81.
Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (2006). Introduction: the dual nature of technical artifacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 1–4.
Lawson, C. (2008). An ontology of technology: Artefacts, relations and functions. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 12(1), 48-64.
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
National Academy of Engineering, & National Research Council. (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11691
Perlman, M. (2004). The modern philosophical resurrection of teleology. The Monist, 87(1), 3-51.
Searle, J. R. (2005). What is an institution?. Journal of institutional economics, 1(1), 1-22.
Thomasson, Amie. (2007). Artifacts and human concepts. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), Creations of the mind: Essays on artifacts and their representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (pp. 52–73).
Vaccari, Andrés. (2013) "Artifact dualism, materiality, and the hard problem of ontology: Some critical remarks on the dual nature of technical artifacts program", Philosophy & Technology 26.1: 7-29.
Vermaas, P., & Houkes, W. (2003). Ascribing functions to technical artifacts: a challenge to etiological accounts of functions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 261–289.
Vermaas, P., & Houkes, W. (2006). Technical functions: a drawbridge between the intentional and structural natures of technical artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 5–18.
Vermaas, P., et al. (2011) "A philosophy of technology: from technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems." Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society 6.1: 1-134.
Weigand, Hans, Paul Johannesson, and Birger Andersson. "An artifact ontology for design science research." Data & Knowledge Engineering 133 (2021): 101878.
Weigand, Hans, Paul Johannesson, and Birger Andersson. "An artifact ontology for design science research." Data & Knowledge Engineering 133 (2021): 101878.
eslami, M. & geraei, A. (2026). A Critical Examination of Certain Western Perspectives on the Ontology of Technology Based on Islamic Philosophy. Journal of Hikmat-e-Islami, 13(50), 105–126.
MLA
eslami, M., & geraei, A. "A Critical Examination of Certain Western Perspectives on the Ontology of Technology Based on Islamic Philosophy", Journal of Hikmat-e-Islami, 13, 50, 2026, 105–126.
HARVARD
eslami, M., & geraei, A. (2026). 'A Critical Examination of Certain Western Perspectives on the Ontology of Technology Based on Islamic Philosophy', Journal of Hikmat-e-Islami, 13(50), pp. 105–126.
CHICAGO
eslami, M. & geraei, A., "A Critical Examination of Certain Western Perspectives on the Ontology of Technology Based on Islamic Philosophy." Journal of Hikmat-e-Islami, 13 50 (2026): 105–126,
VANCOUVER
eslami M., geraei A. A Critical Examination of Certain Western Perspectives on the Ontology of Technology Based on Islamic Philosophy. Journal of Hikmat-e-Islami. 2026;13(50):105–126 (In Persian).
