The interaction between rational and religious sciences is an important but controversial issue with some claiming they are the same and others saying they are different. Those who claim they are different believe that religious sciences being sacred cannot be confused with secular sciences. Those who believe they are the same are of the view that he who has no share of rational sciences will not be able to have a profound and exact understanding of the content of religion. According to moderate attitude, one cannot deny the impact of the rational aspect of religion against its other aspects. Using an analytic-comparative method, this articles deals with the interaction between causality (plus with its subordinates) and religious sciences. It has practically showed that there has been interaction between this rational principle and religion in such issues as external onslaughts, resistance against internal deviations, explanation of rational sciences as the essential article of religion, prevention of misunderstanding, mentioning the distant consequences and answering the objections. The rational approach has on certain occasions had dominance over the literal and popular approach. Islamic philosophy can influence religion (with its three parts of beliefs, rulings and morals) and can hereby theoretically and practically affect individuals and communities through deepening the rational sciences of religion and creating a deep insight
حکیم، سیدمحمدتقی (1418ق). اصول العامه. قم: مجمع عالی اهلبیت.
خرمیان، جواد (1388). قواعد عقلی در قلمرو روایات. تهران: دفتر پژوهش و نشر سهروردی.
داودپور، مرتضی (1390). درآمدی بر مبانی جامعهشناسی اسلامی. قم: موسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی(ره).
13 . رازى تهرانی، قوامالدین محمد (1378). دو رساله فلسفى عین الحکمة و تعلیقات. تصحیح على اوجبى. تهران: وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامى، سازمان چاپ و انتشارات؛ کتابخانه، موزه و مرکز اسناد مجلس شورای اسلامی.
سبحانی تبریزی، جعفر (1412ق). الإلهیات على هدى الکتاب و السنة و العقل(ج1). قم: المرکز العالمی للدراسات الإسلامیة.
سبزوارى، هادیبنمهدی (1379). شرح المنظومه(ج2). تصحیح و تعلیق حسنزاده آملى. تهران: نشر ناب.
شهرزورى، شمسالدینبنمحمد (1383). رسائل الشجرة الالهیة فی علوم الحقایق الربانیة. مقدمه نجفقلى حبیبى. تهران: موسسه پژوهشی حکمت و فلسفه ایران.
شیدانشید، حسینعلی (1383). عقل در اخلاق. قم: پژوهشکده حوزه و دانشگاه.
صدرالدین شیرازی، محمدبنابراهیم (1383). الحاشیة على الهیات الشفاء. قم: بیدار.
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ (1981م). الحکمة المتعالیة فی الأسفار العقلیة الأربعة (ج6). بیروت: داراحیاء التراث العربی.
moghaddam, G. (2017). Philosophical explanation of causality and its interaction with religious sciences. Journal of Hikmat-e-Islami, 3(no.4 (Winter 2017)), 69-90.
MLA
gholamali moghaddam. "Philosophical explanation of causality and its interaction with religious sciences". Journal of Hikmat-e-Islami, 3, no.4 (Winter 2017), 2017, 69-90.
HARVARD
moghaddam, G. (2017). 'Philosophical explanation of causality and its interaction with religious sciences', Journal of Hikmat-e-Islami, 3(no.4 (Winter 2017)), pp. 69-90.
VANCOUVER
moghaddam, G. Philosophical explanation of causality and its interaction with religious sciences. Journal of Hikmat-e-Islami, 2017; 3(no.4 (Winter 2017)): 69-90.